Subject: Minutes of 6/3/96 Interim Meeting

From: "Bill Kwan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 15:57:25 +0000

AIW APPN/HPR MIB SIG & IETF SNA NAU MIB Working Group
Interim Meeting (Phone Conference) 6/3/96

Chair - Bill Kwan, Jupiter

A phone conference was held to review the latest drafts of the
DLUR and HPR MIBs. Thanks to cisco for hosting the meeting.

Attendees:

Steve Berl, cisco
Wayne Clark, cisco
Bob Clouston, cisco
Bill Kwan, Jupiter
Bob Moore, IBM
Laura Petri, IBM
Mark Regan, cisco
Vivian Tseng, cisco

DLUR MIB
---------------
The following items were discussed and agreed upon:

1) Only minor changes or additions to the front matter were
identified:
	a) Section 3 - SNMPv2 should just be SNMP.
	b) Section 4 - Need further clarification of why traps are not
		supported in this MIB (i.e., all defined traps are already
		defined in other MIBs such as APPN).	
2) No changes to the MIB definition were identified.
3) All relevant action items from AIW 10 were incorporated into this latest
   draft of the MIB except:
	a) RECEIVE_TDU_TP object was not added because it was determined
                       to only apply to DLUS.
	b) Objects for LU configuration information were not added due to lack
	   of contributions.
	c) Objects for LU-LU session statistics were not added due to lack of
	   contributions.
4) Will distribute update next week and ask for electronic AP (Approved Pages).
   Will ask for CP (Closed Pages) at AIW 11 (mid-July).  If CP is 
   granted, the MIB will be submitted to IETF NM Area Directorate for 
   review.

HPR MIB
-------------
The following items were discussed and agreed upon:

1) Front Matter Section 3 - SNMPv2 should just be SNMP.
2) Add global CP Name object to allow correlation with the APPN MIB.
3) hprNceDefault - Bob Moore will investigate whether this object is in
   the architecture or useful.
4) hprRtpGlobalState - Investigate adding DEFVAL of notActive. After 
    the meeting, Bob Moore researched the issues and recommends not 
    adding the clause. He felt that the description in RFC1902 of 
    the use of DEFVAL was "weak" (i.e., an agent implementer could pay attention to
    it if he/she felt like it), and seems more applicable for row creation.
5) hprRtpForAnrString - agreed to remove.
6) hprRtpRscv - make read-only. It will not be used to specify the new
   RSCV for operator triggered path switch. That function will not be
   supported with this MIB. A new object will be added for initiating
   a path switch, but the RSCV will be determined by the agent.
7) hprRtpType - agreed to remove.
8) hprRtpState - Bob Moore will submit a new list of proposed states to the
    mailing list.
9) hprRtpMaxSendRate, hprRtpMinSendRate -  need clarification whether
   this   is since connection has been up or since last path switch.
  Bob  Moore   will investigate.
10) hprRtpSendFrames - clarify to say not including duplicates.
11) Add object for RTP receive frames discarded.
12) hprRtpSendBytes, hprRtpRecvBytes - clarify to include RTP transport header.
13) In hprRtpStatusTable, add object for start time.
14) hprRtpStnewForAnrStr - agreed to removed.
15) hprRtpStOldForAnrStr - agreed to removed.
16) hprRtpStResult - Bob Moore was to  submit a new list of proposed results to
      the mailing list. After the meeting, Bob indicated that he will 
      now just row it into the next draft of the MIB.
17) hprNclTable - agreed to removed.
18) Add new NCL table that is indexed by ANR label. Depending on
     whether the entry's destination is local or remote certain objects will be
     applicable.   If the destination is local, the NCE ID object will be valid.
    Otherwise,  the TG object will be valid. In addition, objects for the number
    of frames  sent and received will also be in this table.
19) The next draft will be distributed by 6/14. Since the changes are
     not  minor, electronic AP will not be requested at this time. AP (and
     possibly  CP) will be requested at AIW 11. If CP is granted, the 
    MIB will be submitted to the IETF NM Area Directorate for review.

The next meeting will be at AIW 11 (Week of 7/15/96).